The Synaptic Web and the Flux of Information
What if information and intelligence between websites, content and data are becoming more important than the websites, content and data itself?
What if we don’t have to search for content anymore, but throughout filters, information and intelligence comes to us?
What if the starting point is not the static objects itself, but the dynamic patterns between the objects?
Then we have the notion and new point of perspective of the Synaptic Web:
The Internet is constantly evolving. As the speed, flexibility and complexity of connections increase exponentially, the Web is increasingly beginning to resemble a biological analog; the human brain. But what exactly is it that’s makes us, or the Web, smart?
In the brain, neurologists now believe that it is the density and flexibility of the connections between neurons, not simply neurons themselves, which are at the root of intelligence. These connections are called Synapses.
Even if the total number of brain cells, or neurons, begins to diminish in early adulthood, our ability to generate new connections between neurons and between different parts of the brain – what neurologist call “plasticity” – persists throughout life. What’s more, the brain seems to be like any other muscle in that plasticity can be increased with exercise.
It is at the synapse, the “gap” between one neuron and another, where neural connections are consummated to create pathways that, when used, are reinforced with additional connections and, when unused, are “pruned” to make way for new, more useful pathways. It is these incredible chemical bridges that define the patterns of communication that, at any given time, define our cognitive capacity.
The patterns between content are more important than the content itself, this all relates back to the Content versus Context relationship. The Context or patterns between objects do become meaningful as soon as the need is there. A good example given on the site is the following, which fits and builds further on the Social Web:
Social profiles are becoming real-time streams. If the old profile was a neuron, the stream is a neural pathway or pattern. It is the connective tissue between applications and people that feeds information from one node to another. Profiles come and go, people express themselves using countless tools and technologies – the stream, however, is the consistent and persistent channel that matters. It is the new presentation metaphor that increases the level of information we can consume while reducing our sense of overload. Just like synapses, they fire, and like synapses, it is the collective patterns of multiple firings – multiple signals or re-tweets – that creates a pattern. Patterns create meaning. Tune in, tune out, it doesn’t matter. The information will find you if it matters. Implicit information derived from content and gestures is one of the great opportunities of the Synaptic Web. To observe a set of gestures and connect them together creates a dynamic profile of interests, intentions and friends that can be used for discovery and filtering.
Changing the point of view from objects to connections can be applied to numerous examples because it simply diverts the relationship between the two.
There’s always the chance that people will object to terms like these, like there was critique on terms like Web 2.0 or Social Media, though I do find the difference between the Synaptic Web and the Semantic Web an important one in terms of execution and feasibility.
See below the video on the explenation and implications of the Synaptic Web
An interesting notion, which implicates the way we use the Web and how we can enhance the Web is the shift from Search to Filtering.
When we look at the state of our society, being hyperconnective, ubiquitous and real-time, the process of filtering much better adapts this state than search.
Different roles, different and morphing interests/behavior, the flux of information is real, relating this to the information overload which we’re being confronted with because we’re not able to mould the accessible information to the current needs well, is a concrete challenge with massive business opportunities.
Look at the amount of third party Twitter applications, all trying to give clear overviews of information streams, being able to handle them.
Look at Augmented Reality which superimpose meta-data upon the request of the user, needing that particular information by relating location, interest/behavior and available content.
Look at the media convergence which is becoming visible, a new dimension is added which complicates the processing of (streaming) information between devices.
Look at Google Wave, an open collaboration tool which morphs continiously depending on the purpose, being able to be plugged into other systems.
Another notion is by emphasizing the connection instead of the object, reflects the state of fragmented information concerning an entity. This entity might be a company, a person, a topic and so on. Bits of information are scattered throughout the Web, visible on different networks and types of sites, all having different patterns within the networks and between networks, here the information itself is the same, but the context, the patterns between the objects in these networks, define how it can be interpreted.
Having a different point of perspective and look on the Internet is refreshing for both the evolution of the Internet on abstract level and the concrete evolution in terms of applications and needs on the Internet.
What are your thoughts on the Synaptic Web and the flux of information?
Related Posts
Responses to “The Synaptic Web and the Flux of Information”
Trackbacks
- uberVU - social comments
- Tweets that mention The Synaptic Web and the Flux of Information | Agora Media Group Blog - Travel Industry, Social TV, tCommerce, 3D, Augmented Reality, Marketing, Design, Applications, Mobile, Open Source -- Topsy.com

@ Chris,
Thanks for the great words, good to read that from you!
I love the name “Synaptic web” and the importance of connections !
However, I believe this actually describes the web itself – lots of individual sites and pages that are *connected* using hyperlinks.
I don’t agree that “The patterns between content are more important than the content itself” – without the content the patterns/connections are useless, but they increase/strengthen the value of the content.
A great example is Wikipedia; imagine if all the internal links were removed – it would still contain a lot of useful information, but it would be much harder to find related information as you would have to search manually for it yourself.
Which also illustrates the point of filtering; you may find a topic in Wikipedia through searching, but further information is often found using the internal hyperlinks that are “filtered” to only link to related information (otherwise, almost every word in Wikipedia could have been a hyperlink).
Very interesting article
Hi Atle,
I do refer with patterns versus content, in a way that content and context are symbiotic.
Truly, the two cannot go without each other, be it patterns-content or content-context.
Right now though, context/patterns do become more important, because the data on itself is not enough anymore.
When the Web just started to form itself, an HTML page was enough, by evolution of the Web, the context gets more focus, because of the massiveness, the flux.
Good example of Wikipedia!
The content-context relationship is so important that it’s actually the root of all what’s wrong with search today. We define context through keywords, when searching for content as well as when making it ‘searchable’. The process of matching content to context thus breaks down to two steps: 1) first, matching content to keywords 2) then, matching keywords to context, and so the result ends up badly distorted.
What the synaptic web does, is defining the connection explicitly instead of relying on an implicit connection hinted by keywords. That’s why search gets replaced (in most cases) by filtering. A piece of content with relevant connections is centered in its ideal context. There’s no need to search, only to ‘look around’. More on this topic in my blog: http://collectiveweb.wordpress.com/category/web/search-engines/
@Atle:
Hyperlinks make very poor connections. The synaptic web paradigm goes far beyond this by defining connections that actually say something about the relation between two pieces of content.
@ Dan,
I’ve gone through a couple of your articles on your blog, excellent articles.
Content mapping is exactly that, what filtering can accomplish better in getting matching results.
What’s your opinion on personalized search by Google for instance?
Another article that might interest you is: The Content – Context Diarchy -> http://agoramedia.co.uk/blog/marketing/the-content-context-diarchy/
Commented on the content-context diarchy post.
As for personalization, it’s a necessary step regardless of who’s gonna really get there first. Search is a process for eliminating an uncertainty occurring in a complex environment. The uncertainty is influenced by any factor that influences the searcher, and so is the context.
If we want to get the context right, which is basically the tunnel to the solution, we have to consider all those factors under the umbrella of “personalization”. Present and emerging solutions grasp the importance of personal preferences, social circle and location, but we shouldn’t forget about time and mood for instance either. Google’s personalized search is a good start, but there’s more down the road.
Great post.
The web is at a point where it can finally shift away from a hyperlinked world to a better and more interesting synaptic world.
The explosion of social media and the human filtering, ordering, and tagging that has come along with it has opened up a new horizon. Machines can only do so much. Google’s results are good but it’s the human element and the “hidden” connections that bring great content together in the context we’re looking for.
-Chris
@ Chris
It’s exactly that, that makes this complicated. The human, not-mechanizable element, which is at the same time a context definer, giving meaning to content, environment and goal.
Do wonder how this will or even can be solved through machine learning etc.
@ Dan
Do you think we should even strive for such solutions, which are able to fully grasp the umbrella of personalization? Time, mood, role that the person is in at that point of time etc…
@ Chris-Restream
Indeed, the Web now is evolving, just like the brain does. All the elements are present already, just morphing.
The power of the Synaptic Web, as a focus/term, is the fact that it emphasizes also/another aspect of the Web which perfectly fits the evolution of it.